Référencé par
13 entrant▸
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said from Abu Bakr ibn Hazm
that a boy from Ghassan was dying in Madina while his heir was in
Syria. That was mentioned to Umar ibn al-Khattab. It was said to him,
"So-and-so is dying. Shall he make a bequest?" He said, "Let him make
a bequest."
Yahya ibn Said said that Abu Bakr had said, "He
was a boy of ten or twelve years." Yahya said, "He willed the well of
Jusham, and his people sold it for 30,000 dirhams."
Yahya
said that he heard Malik say, "The generally agreed-on way of doing
things in our community is that a simpleton, an idiot, or a lunatic
who recovers at times, can make wills if they have enough of their
wits about them to recognise what they will. Someone who has not
enough wits to recognise what he wills, and is overcome in his
intellect, cannot make a bequest."
Yahya said that he heard Malik speak about a man who bought goods
- animals or clothes or wares, and the sale was found not to be
permitted so it was revoked and the one who had taken the goods was
ordered to return the owner his goods. Malik said, "The owner of the
goods only has their value on the day they were taken from him, and
not on the day they are returned to him. That is because the man is
liable for them from the day he took them and whatever loss is in them
after that is against him. For that reason, their increase and growth
are also his. A man may take the goods at a time when they are selling
well and are in demand, and then have to return them at a time when
they have fallen in price and no one wants them. For instance, the man
may take the goods from the other man, and sell them for ten dinars or
keep them while their price is that. Then he may have to return them
while their price is only a dinar. He should not go off with nine
dinars from the man's property. Or perhaps they are taken by the man,
and he sells them for a dinar or keeps them, while their price is only
a dinar, then he has to return them, and their value on the day he
returns them is ten dinars. The one who took them does not have to pay
nine dinars from his property to the owner. He is only obliged to pay
the value of what he took possession of on the day it was taken ."
He said, "Part of what clarifies this is that when a thief
steals goods, only their price on the day he stole them is looked at.
If cutting off the hand is necessary because of it, that is done. If
the cutting off is delayed, either because the thief is imprisoned
until his situation is examined or he flees and then is caught, the
delay of the cutting off of the hand does not make the hadd, which was
obliged for him on the day he stole, fall from him even if those goods
become cheap after that. Nor does delay oblige cutting off the hand if
it was not obliged on the day he took those goods, even if they become
expensive after that."
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab from Amir ibn Sad ibn Abi
Waqqas that his father said, "The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless
him and grant him peace, came to me to treat me for a pain which
became hard to bear in the year of the farewell hajj. I said,
'Messenger of Allah, you can see how far the pain has reached me. I
have property and only my daughter inherits from me. Shall I give two
thirds of my property as sadaqa?' The Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, said, 'No.' I said, 'Half?' He said,
'No.' Then the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, said, 'A third, and a third is a lot. Leaving your heirs rich
is better than leaving them poor to beg from people. You never spend
anything on maintenance desiring the Face of Allah by it, but that you
are rewarded for it, even what you appoint for your wife.' Sad said,
'Messenger of Allah, will I be left here in Makka after my companions
have departed for Madina?' The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him
and grant him peace, said, 'If you are left behind, and do sound deeds
you will increase your degree and elevation by them. Perhaps you will
be left behind so that some people may benefit by you and others may
be harmed by you. O Allah! complete their hijra for my companions, and
do not turn them back on their heels. The unfortunate one is Said ibn
Khawla.' The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, was distressed on his account for he had died at Makka."
Yahya said that he heard Malik speak about a man who willed a
third of his property to a man and said as well, "My slave will serve
so-and-so (another man) for as long as he lives, then he is free,"
then that was looked into, and the slave was found to be a third of
the property of the deceased. Malik said, "The service of the slave is
evaluated. Then the two of them divide it between them. The one who
was willed a third takes his third, as a share, and the one who was
willed the service of the slave takes what was evaluated for him of
the slave's service. Each of them takes, from the service of the slave
or from his wage if he has a wage, according to his share. If the one
who was given the service of the slave for as long as he lived dies,
then the slave is freed."
Yahya said that he heard Malik
speak about someone who willed his third and said "So-and-so has such-
and-such, and so-and-so has such-and-such," naming some of his
property, and his heirs protested that it was more than a third."
Malik said, "The heirs then have an option between giving the
beneficiaries their full bequests and taking the rest of the property
of the deceased, or between dividing among the beneficiaries the third
of the property of the deceased and surrendering to them their third.
If they wish, their rights in it reach as far as they reach."
Yahya said that he heard Malik say, "This ayat is abrogated. It
is the word of Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, 'If he leaves goods,
the testament is for parents and kinsmen.' What came down about the
division of the fixed shares of inheritance in the Book of Allah, the
Mighty, the Exalted, abrogated it."
Yahya said that he heard
Malik say, "The established sunna with us, in which there is no
dispute, is that it is not permitted for a testator to make a bequest
(in addition to the fixed share) in favour of an heir, unless the
other heirs permit him. If some of them permit him and others refuse,
he is allowed to diminish the share of those who have given their
permission. Those who refuse take their full share from the
inheritance.
Yahya said that he heard Malik speak about an
invalid who made a bequest and asked his heirs to give him permission
to make a bequest when he was so ill that he only had command of a
third of his property, and they gave him permission to leave some of
his heirs more than his third. Malik said, "They cannot revoke that.
Had they been permitted to do so, every heir would have done that, and
then, when the testator died, they would take that for themselves and
prevent him from bequeathing his third and what was permitted to him
with respect to his property."
Malik said, "If he asks
permission of his heirs to grant a bequest to an heir while he is well
and they give him permission, that is not binding on them. The heirs
can rescind that if they wish. That is because when a man is well, he
is entitled to all his property and can do what he wishes with it. If
he wishes, he can spend all of it. He can spend it and give sadaqa
with it or give it to whomever he likes. His asking permission of his
heirs is permitted for the heirs, when they give him permission when
authority over all his property is closed off from him and nothing
outside of the third is permitted to him, and when they are more
entitled to the two-thirds of his property than he is himself. That is
when their permission becomes relevant. If he asks one of the heirs to
give his inheritance to him when he is dying, and the heir agrees and
then the dying man does not dispose of it at all, it is returned to
the one who gave it unless the deceased said to him, 'So-and-so - (one
of his heirs) - is weak, and I would like you to give him your
inheritance.' So he gives it to him. That is permitted when the
deceased specified it for him."
Malik said, "When a man gives
the dying man free use of his share of the inheritance, and the dying
man distributes some of it and some remains, it is returned to the
giver, after the man has died."
Yahya said that he heard
Malik speak about someone who made a bequest and mentioned that he had
given one of his heirs something which he had not taken possession of,
so the heirs refused to permit that. Malik said, "That gift returns to
the heirs as inheritance according to the Book of Allah because the
deceased did not mean that to be taken out of the third and the heirs
do not have a portion in the third (which the dying man is allowed to
bequeath)."
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said that Abu'd-Darda wrote to
Salman al-Farsi, "Come immediately to the holy land." Salman wrote
back to him, "Land does not make anyone holy. Man's deeds make him
holy. I have heard that you were put up as a doctor to treat and cure
people. If you are innocent, then may you have delight! If you are a
quack, then beware lest you kill a man and enter the Fire!" When
Abu'd-Darda judged between two men, and they turned from him to go, he
would look at them and say, "Come back to me, and tell me your story
again. A quack! By Allah!"
Yahya said that he heard Malik
say, "If someone makes use of a slave, without permission of its
master, in anything important to him, whose like has a fee, he is
liable for what befalls the slave if anything befalls him. If the
slave is safe and his master asks for his wage for what he has done,
that is the master's right. This is what is done in our community."
Yahya said that he heard Malik say about a slave who is part
free and part enslaved, "His property is suspended in his hand and he
cannot begin anything with it. He eats from it and clothes himself in
an approved fashion. If he dies, his property belongs to the one to
whom he is in slavery."
Yahya said that he heard Malik say,
"The way of doing things in our community is that a parent can take
his child to account for what he spends on him from the day the child
has property, cash or goods, if the parent wants that."
Malik related to me from Nafi from Abdullah ibn Umar that the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "It
is the duty of a muslim man who has something to be given as a bequest
not to spend two nights without writing a will about it."
Malik said, "The generally agreed-on way of doing things in our
community is that when the testator writes something in health or
illness as a bequest, and it has freeing slaves or things other than
that in it, he can alter it in any way he chooses, until he is on his
deathbed. If he prefers to abandon a bequest or change it, he can do
so unless he has made a slave mudabbar (to be freed after his death).
If he has made him mudabbar, there is no way to change what he has
made mudabbar. He is allowed to change his testament because the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "It
is the duty of a muslim man who has something to be given as a bequest
not to spend two nights without writing a will about it."
Malik explained, "Had the testator not been able to change his will
nor what was mentioned in it about freeing slaves, each testator might
withhold making bequests from his property, whether in freeing slaves
or other than it. A man gives a bequest in his health and in his
travelling." (i.e. he does not wait till his death bed ) .
Malik summed up, "The way of doing things in our community about which
there is no dispute is that he can change whatever he likes of that
except for the mudabbar."
Yahya said that he heard Malik say, "The best of what I have
heard about the testament of a pregnant woman and about what
settlements she is permitted in her property is that the pregnant
woman is like the sick person. When the illness is light, and one does
not fear for the sick person, he does with his property what he likes.
If the illness is such that his life is feared for, he can only
dispose of a third of his estate."
He said, "It is the same
with a woman who is pregnant. The beginning of pregnancy is good news
and joy. It is not illness and no fear because Allah the Blessed, the
Exalted, said in His Book, 'We gave her good news of Ishaq and after
Ishaq, Yaqub.' (Sura ll ayat 71). And He said, 'She bore a light
burden and passed by with it, but when she became heavy, they called
upon Allah, their Lord, "If you give us a good-doing son, we will be
among the thankful." '(Sura 7 ayat 189).
"When a pregnant
woman becomes heavy, she is only permitted to dispose of a third of
her estate. The beginning of this restriction is after six months.
Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, said in His Book, 'Mothers suckle
their children for two complete years.' And He said, 'his bearing and
weaning are thirty months.' (Sura 2 ayat 233).
"When six
months have passed for the pregnant woman from the day she conceived,
she is only permitted to dispose of a third of her property."
Yahya said that he heard Malik say, "A man who is advancing in the row
for battle, can only dispose of a third of his property. He is in the
same position as a pregnant woman or an ill person who is feared for,
as long as he is in that situation."
Traductions
🇬🇧 English
Wills and Testaments
